Skip to content

Should You Monetize Your Personal Coding Projects?

I built 26 budget tracker apps. Different colors, same core functionality. Each time I thought, “This one will be the one that takes off.” Spoiler: none of them did.

This is the trap I fell into—the monetization mindset that turns creative coding into a numbers game. Let me share what I learned about when monetization makes sense, and when you’re better off building just for yourself.

The Monetization Temptation

Every developer has been there. You build something useful, maybe even polished. A voice in your head says:

The Monetization Pipeline (The Dream)
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ THE MONETIZATION PIPELINE (The Dream) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ Build App ──► Ship It ──► ??? ──► Profit! │
│ │
│ (What could go wrong?) │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

The indie hacker success stories make it look easy. Build something, put a price tag on it, watch the MRR grow. But here’s what nobody tells you about the ”???” in that diagram.

The Reality Check

Market Saturation Is Real

From a Reddit discussion I followed, one developer shared that they built 26 budget tracker apps—“all the same just different colours.” This isn’t a joke. This is what happens when you chase markets without validation.

The Saturation Problem
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ BUDGET TRACKER MARKET │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ App Store Results for "budget tracker": ~500+ apps │
│ │
│ Top 10 capture 90% of downloads │
│ Apps 11-100 fight for 9% │
│ Apps 101+ share 1% │
│ │
│ Your new app ──► Where do you fit? │
│ │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Support Is a Full-Time Job

Monetization isn’t just about adding a payment button. It’s about:

ResponsibilityTime InvestmentEmotional Cost
Customer supportHours per weekHigh—angry users
Feature requestsOngoingMedium—can’t please everyone
Bug fixesUnpredictableHigh—your reputation
DocumentationDays per releaseLow—but tedious
MarketingNever endsHigh—constant rejection

When someone says “Not everyone vibecodes to sell,” they’re pointing to a fundamental truth: commercialization changes your relationship with code.

Opportunity Cost

Every hour spent on customer support is an hour not spent learning new technologies, building new projects, or—ironically—building the next thing that might actually have a market.

Time Allocation Comparison
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ BEFORE MONETIZATION │
│ Coding: ████████████████████████ 80% │
│ Learning: ████████████ 20% │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ AFTER MONETIZATION │
│ Coding: ████████████ 40% │
│ Support: ████████ 25% │
│ Marketing: ████████ 25% │
│ Learning: ██ 10% │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

When Monetization Actually Makes Sense

I’m not saying monetization is always wrong. After much trial and error, I’ve identified three conditions that must ALL be true:

Condition 1: Validated Demand Beyond Yourself

You’ve spoken to actual potential customers (not friends who’ll say nice things), and they’ve expressed willingness to pay. Not “that sounds cool”—actual “here’s my credit card” interest.

The validation checklist:

  • Strangers (not friends) have expressed purchase intent
  • You’ve used “The Mom Test” techniques for honest feedback
  • People are actively searching for solutions to this problem
  • You’ve identified a specific, reachable audience

Condition 2: A Unique Angle in a Crowded Market

If you’re building the 27th budget tracker, you need something genuinely different. Not just a different color scheme or marginally better UX—a fundamentally different approach.

Finding Your Unique Angle
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ SATURATED APPROACH: │
│ "Another todo app, but with better UI" │
│ ──► Buried in the app store │
│ │
│ UNIQUE APPROACH: │
│ "A todo app specifically for ADHD adults, with │
│ built-in dopamine triggers and executive function │
│ support designed with a neuropsychologist" │
│ ──► Clear target audience, clear differentiation │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Condition 3: Commitment to Long-Term Support

This is the hardest one to assess honestly. Are you ready to:

  • Respond to customer emails during your vacation?
  • Fix bugs that affect paying customers within hours, not weeks?
  • Maintain compatibility across OS updates for years?

If you answered “maybe” to any of these, you might want to reconsider.

The Healthy Alternative: Building for Yourself

Here’s what shifted my perspective: I started building tools I genuinely needed for my own workflow. No market research, no validation, no monetization plan.

What I got instead:

  1. Immediate utility — I was my own customer
  2. Portfolio value — Demonstrated skills to employers
  3. Learning depth — No deadline pressure meant deeper exploration
  4. Creative freedom — No feature request demands
  5. Optional open sourcing — Community contribution without support burden

The Open Source Option

If your project could help others, open sourcing offers a middle ground:

Open Source Benefits vs Commercialization
┌──────────────────────┬────────────────────┬───────────────────┐
│ Aspect │ Open Source │ Commercial │
├──────────────────────┼────────────────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Revenue │ None (usually) │ Potential MRR │
│ Support pressure │ Community helps │ All on you │
│ Portfolio value │ High │ High │
│ Learning value │ Very high │ Moderate │
│ Stress level │ Low │ High │
│ Time freedom │ Complete │ Customer-dependent│
│ Market validation │ Stars/forks signal │ Sales signal │
└──────────────────────┴────────────────────┴───────────────────┘

A Decision Framework

When I’m now tempted to monetize, I run through this flowchart mentally:

Monetization Decision Flow
┌─────────────────┐
│ Built something │
│ useful? │
└────────┬────────┘
┌──────────────┴──────────────┐
▼ ▼
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ Yes │ │ No │
└──────┬──────┘ └──────┬──────┘
│ │
▼ ▼
┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
│ Do others ask │ │ Keep building │
│ for it? │ │ for yourself │
└────────┬────────┘ └─────────────────┘
┌────────┴────────┐
▼ ▼
┌────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ Yes │ │ No │
└───┬────┘ └────┬─────┘
│ │
▼ ▼
┌────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
│ Will you │ │ Open source it? │
│ support it? │ └────────┬────────┘
└───────┬────────┘ │
│ ┌────────┴────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
┌────────┐ ┌────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ Yes │ │ Yes │ │ No │
└────┬───┘ └───┬────┘ └────┬─────┘
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
┌──────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌───────────┐
│Consider │ │ Open source │ │Keep it │
│monetize │ │ for community│ │private │
└──────────┘ └──────────────┘ └───────────┘

Signs You Should NOT Monetize

Based on my own missteps and observations from the community:

  • You’re building in a saturated market without differentiation. (See: my 26 budget trackers)
  • You’re not willing to commit to long-term support. A paid product is a promise.
  • You’re doing it “for the learning.” You’ll learn more by building for yourself or open sourcing.
  • Validation consists of “my friends think it’s cool.” Friends are terrible validators.
  • You’re burned out from your day job and looking for passive income. Product work isn’t passive.

Signs You SHOULD Consider Monetization

  • Strangers have offered to pay without you suggesting it.
  • You’ve found a narrow, underserved niche. (e.g., “productivity tools for left-handed accountants who work remotely in time zones with 12-hour offsets”—okay, maybe not that narrow)
  • You genuinely enjoy the problem space and would work on it for free.
  • You have the time and energy for support, marketing, and maintenance.
  • You’ve validated with The Mom Test methodology and gotten genuine signals.

In Summary

In this post, I shared my journey from building 26 nearly-identical budget trackers to understanding when monetization actually makes sense. The key lesson: not every project needs to be a product. Building for yourself first gives you immediate utility, portfolio value, and learning depth. Monetization adds customer support, marketing, and opportunity costs that can transform a creative outlet into another job.

The healthiest approach I’ve found: build what you need, share what works, and let the market tell you if there’s commercial potential—rather than forcing it. Some of the best tools I use daily were built by developers who solved their own problems first, then discovered others had the same problems.

If you’re considering monetization, run through the three-condition framework: validated demand beyond yourself, a unique angle, and genuine commitment to long-term support. Miss any one of these, and you might be better off keeping your project as a labor of love rather than a source of stress.

Final Words + More Resources

My intention with this article was to help others share my knowledge and experience. If you want to contact me, you can contact by email: Email me

Here are also the most important links from this article along with some further resources that will help you in this scope:

Oh, and if you found these resources useful, don’t forget to support me by starring the repo on GitHub!

Comments