How to Build a Fully Autonomous AI Agent from Scratch
Purpose
This post demonstrates how to build a fully autonomous AI agent from scratch. I’ll show you how to wire together orchestration, memory, and observability using LangChain, CrewAI, or PydanticAI.
The real challenge isn’t building the agent - it’s keeping it running when tokens expire at 2am.
Environment
- Python 3.11+
- LangChain 0.3
- CrewAI 0.28
- PydanticAI 0.0.10
- Mem0 0.1
- LangSmith API access
The Three Pillars
An autonomous AI agent needs three components:
[User Request] -> [Orchestration Layer (LangChain/CrewAI/PydanticAI)] | v [Tool Selection] -> [External APIs/Services] | v [Memory Layer (Mem0)] <-> [Persistent Storage] | v [Observability (LangSmith/Helicone)] | v [Response/Action]I’ll show you how each framework handles these pillars.
Framework Comparison
| Framework | Best For | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | Maximum customization | 200+ integrations, LangGraph |
| CrewAI | Multi-agent teams | Declarative roles, collaboration |
| PydanticAI | Type-safe outputs | Pydantic validation, FastAPI-like |
I’ve used all three in production. Here’s what I found.
Building with LangChain
LangChain gives you maximum control. I use it when I need fine-grained tool orchestration.
Basic Agent with Memory
from langchain.agents import create_agentfrom langchain.tools import toolfrom langgraph.store.memory import InMemoryStore
store = InMemoryStore()store.put(("users",), "user_123", {"preferences": "dark mode"})
@tooldef get_user_info(runtime) -> str: """Look up user info from memory.""" store = runtime.store user_info = store.get(("users",), runtime.context.user_id) return str(user_info.value) if user_info else "Unknown"
agent = create_agent( model="claude-sonnet-4-5", tools=[get_user_info], store=store, memory=True)The key parts:
InMemoryStoreholds user context between turns- The
@tooldecorator exposes functions to the agent memory=Trueenables conversation history
Memory Scoping
Memory isn’t one-size-fits-all. I use different scopes for different needs:
| Scope | Use Case | Persistence |
|---|---|---|
| user_id | User preferences | Permanent |
| run_id | Session context | Temporary |
| agent_id | Agent-specific knowledge | Permanent |
# User-level: persists across sessionsstore.put(("users", "preferences"), "user_123", {"theme": "dark"})
# Run-level: clears when session endsstore.put(("runs", "context"), "run_456", {"current_task": "summarize"})
# Agent-level: shared across usersstore.put(("agents", "knowledge"), "agent_789", {"common_patterns": [...]})Building with CrewAI
CrewAI shines when you need multiple agents working together. I use it for research and writing workflows.
Multi-Agent Research Team
from crewai import Agent, Crew, Taskfrom crewai_tools import SerperDevTool
search_tool = SerperDevTool()
researcher = Agent( role="Research Analyst", goal="Find accurate information", backstory="Expert researcher with 10 years experience", tools=[search_tool], memory=True, max_iter=25)
writer = Agent( role="Content Writer", goal="Create engaging content", backstory="Former journalist turned AI assistant", memory=True)
research_task = Task( description="Research the latest AI agent frameworks", agent=researcher)
writing_task = Task( description="Write a blog post based on research", agent=writer)
crew = Crew( agents=[researcher, writer], tasks=[research_task, writing_task])
result = crew.kickoff()The agents share memory and coordinate through the crew. Each agent has a defined role that shapes how it approaches tasks.
Why CrewAI Works for Teams
I found CrewAI useful when:
- Tasks have distinct phases (research → write → edit)
- Each phase needs different expertise
- Agents need to pass context to each other
The declarative syntax keeps the agent definitions readable.
Building with PydanticAI
PydanticAI is the new player. I use it when I need guaranteed structured outputs.
Type-Safe Agent Responses
from pydantic import BaseModel, Fieldfrom pydantic_ai import Agent
class SupportResponse(BaseModel): advice: str = Field(description='Advice for customer') escalate: bool = Field(description='Whether to escalate') risk_level: int = Field(ge=0, le=10)
agent = Agent('openai:gpt-4', output_type=SupportResponse)result = agent.run_sync("Customer complaint about billing")
# Type-safe access - IDE autocomplete worksprint(result.output.advice)print(result.output.escalate)print(result.output.risk_level)The output_type parameter forces the LLM to return valid Pydantic models. If the model returns invalid data, PydanticAI retries automatically.
When PydanticAI Wins
I use PydanticAI for:
- Customer support classification
- Data extraction pipelines
- Any task needing validated JSON output
The validation saves me from writing parsing code.
Adding Memory with Mem0
All three frameworks benefit from external memory. I use Mem0 for persistent user context.
from mem0 import MemoryClient
mem0 = MemoryClient()
# Store conversation contextmem0.add([ {"role": "user", "content": "I prefer morning workouts"}, {"role": "assistant", "content": "Noted. I'll schedule for mornings."}], user_id="user_123")
# Retrieve relevant memories latermemories = mem0.search("workout schedule", user_id="user_123", limit=3)for memory in memories: print(memory["memory"])Mem0 handles:
- Semantic search over past conversations
- User-specific memory isolation
- Long-term storage
I’ve found it useful for agents that need to remember user preferences across sessions.
Error Handling in Production
Here’s the part most tutorials skip. Building an agent is easy. Keeping it running is hard.
Token Expiration at 2am
I learned this the hard way. One expired token broke five workflows at 2am.
from tenacity import retry, stop_after_attempt, wait_exponentialimport logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
class TokenExpiredError(Exception): pass
class RateLimitError(Exception): def __init__(self, retry_after: int): self.retry_after = retry_after
@retry( stop=stop_after_attempt(3), wait=wait_exponential(multiplier=1, min=4, max=10))def invoke_agent_with_retry(agent, message): try: result = agent.invoke(message) return result except TokenExpiredError: logger.warning("Token expired, refreshing credentials") refresh_credentials() raise # Let retry handle it except RateLimitError as e: logger.warning(f"Rate limited, retry after {e.retry_after}s") raise except Exception as e: logger.error(f"Unexpected error: {e}") raiseThe retry decorator handles transient failures. But you also need:
import asynciofrom datetime import datetime
async def credential_watcher(): """Check credentials every 5 minutes""" while True: try: await check_all_tokens() await check_all_api_keys() except ExpiredCredential as e: alert_oncall(f"Credential expired: {e}") await refresh_credentials() await asyncio.sleep(300) # 5 minutes
async def check_all_tokens(): for service in registered_services: if service.token_expires_soon(): raise ExpiredCredential(service.name)I run this watcher as a background task alongside my agents.
Observability with LangSmith
When something goes wrong, you need to see what happened. LangSmith gives you visibility into agent execution.
import langsmith as ls
# Trace agent invocationswith ls.tracing_context("agent_invocation"): result = agent.invoke({"messages": [user_message]})
# Log custom metricsls.log_metric("response_time_ms", response_time)ls.log_metric("tokens_used", token_count)In the LangSmith dashboard, I can see:
- Every tool call the agent made
- Token usage per request
- Where the agent got stuck
- Failed reasoning chains
What to Monitor
I track these metrics:
┌─────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────┐│ Metric │ Alert Threshold │├─────────────────────┼────────────────────────────────┤│ Token usage │ > 80% of daily limit ││ Error rate │ > 5% in 5-minute window ││ Response latency │ > 10s p99 ││ Retry count │ > 3 per request ││ Tool failures │ Any tool failure │└─────────────────────┴────────────────────────────────┘The Real Lessons
After running agents in production for months, here’s what I learned:
Building is the easy part. I assembled my first autonomous agent in an afternoon using LangChain and Mem0.
Reliability is the hard part. Token expiration, rate limits, API changes - these will break your agent. Plan for them from day one.
Memory matters more than you think. Without persistent memory, your agent forgets user context between sessions. Users hate repeating themselves.
Observability saves debugging time. When your agent makes 20 tool calls and fails on the 19th, you need to see every step. LangSmith or Helicone are worth the cost.
Start simple, add complexity later. I began with a single agent, then added multi-agent orchestration only when needed. Don’t over-engineer upfront.
Summary
In this post, I showed how to build autonomous AI agents using LangChain, CrewAI, and PydanticAI. The key point is that building the agent takes an afternoon, but production reliability requires proper error handling, memory management, and observability.
Choose LangChain for maximum control, CrewAI for multi-agent teams, or PydanticAI for type-safe outputs. Add Mem0 for memory and LangSmith for debugging. Then spend your time on error handling - that’s what will wake you up at 2am.
Final Words + More Resources
My intention with this article was to help others share my knowledge and experience. If you want to contact me, you can contact by email: Email me
Here are also the most important links from this article along with some further resources that will help you in this scope:
- 👨💻 LangChain Documentation
- 👨💻 CrewAI Documentation
- 👨💻 PydanticAI Documentation
- 👨💻 Mem0 Documentation
- 👨💻 LangSmith Observability
- 👨💻 Reddit Discussion: AI Agent Building
Oh, and if you found these resources useful, don’t forget to support me by starring the repo on GitHub!
Comments